The Issue, Part II

[Read the first part here.]

Why do all, or nearly all, of our (Lutheran–but a very convincing case can be made that the mainline denominations are simply further along the degeneration caused by a Law/Gospel polarity) problems stem from the central issue of failing properly to distinguish Law and Gospel? 

Think about your conversations on closed communion, women’s ordination, or any other issue where you (if you are orthodox) say something ought not to be done.  What does your conversation partner respond, sooner or later, depending on how much American Lutheranism they’ve absorbed?  “You can’t say ‘no’ to that.  That’s the Law.  We live in the Gospel.  You can’t exclude people from the Table–that’s Law.  You can’t say women can’t be ordained–that’s Law.  You can’t tell me not to use this heretical song in my service–that’s Law.  You can’t tell me to give money for the congregation and the poor–that’s Law.  You can’t tell me not to divorce my wife–that’s Law.  You can’t tell me not to have sex with my girlfriend–that’s Law.”  Etc., etc., etc.  In all of these things, Law is bad and Gospel is good.  Anything that sounds like Law–let’s be clear: is Law–is ruled out and you’re left muttering something incoherent because you know that we’re supposed to be under the Gospel and not the Law.  At this point, you’ve got absolutely no retort if you’ve been fully indoctrinated with the Law vs. Gospel paradigm.  They’ve won that and every other argument.  Why do you think it is that the heretical parties in all mainline denominations have been so successful?  It’s not because they’re more numerous.  It’s because they have “the Gospel” on their side, and all you’ve got is that stale, old Law.  The Law is not nice.  It’s not polite.  It’s not “open and accepting.”  Who wants to be on the side of the Law? 

And it’s the Law–God’s Law–that has become the problem, and the sinner is off the hook.  You see, we had it backwards in the ’70s.  We knew they couldn’t mess with the Bible.  We did not realize that it is only the proper distinction between Law and Gospel that will prevent the Bible from being lost.  If we had told them to get lost with their Law/Gospel reductionism, we would have been more likely to have kept the Scriptures as the prophetic and apostolic witnesses to Christ, and we also could have retained a strong foundation with which to fight anti-Christian attacks on the Office of the Holy Ministry and the Lord’s Supper. 

Thus, if we do not return to a Scriptural, Lutheran understanding of Law and Gospel, the altars will be open, the ministry will be open, marriage will be no more (that one’s pretty much gone anyway), and Christians will (continue to) live like pagans.  Those are the consequences.  Will we stem the tide soon enough?  Only God knows.  Perhaps the Gospel will, as Luther predicted (rightly) of Germany, move on from Missouri.



2 thoughts on “The Issue, Part II

  1. From a Walther’s sermon, The Disastrous Results of Despising God’s Law , preached on the 18th Sunday after Trinity, 1844

    Once a person begins to take the Law of God doctrine seriously, then he certainly is not far from Christ and His kingdom either.

    Why was it that at Luther’s time the Gospel was received with such great, almost universal joy? Why was it that then within a short period of time entire countries were converted? Why did the message of peace spread like wildfire over the whole known world? Why did thousands and thousands of hearts immediately open to the courageous herald of the Gospel, kissed the booklets he published with tears and joy, and gladly thanked God for His precious visitation of grace? Why did the preaching of the Gospel have such great, glorious results then, and not now? Here is why. At the time of the Reformation the poor people had been oppressed by the burden of the Law. For even in the midst of the preceding dark ages the unspiritual priests had yet sharply proclaimed the Law. Great numbers were therefore filled with deep concern for their salvation, and with great fear and anxiety of eternal damnation. Great numbers felt their sins. That is why the Gospel was such a blessed message to their ears, just as those are blessed whose prison gates are opened and who are told: “You are free!” But this preparation of men’s hearts by the workings of the Law is now generally missing.

    And why was it that Luther had to complain so soon that the men of his times were tired of the Gospel? It was because most misused the Gospel freedom and again became secure, no longer heeded the threats of the Law, and again considered their sins unimportant. Thus the Gospel, too, was soon despised again, a contempt which has reached its peak in our days.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s