(Two of) The Big Three Do Not Disappoint

Ben noted one of the comments from the Big Three below, but two out of three of them gave us good soundbites that point to the fact that Judge Alito is extremely well-qualified (including this: “Alito was unanimously[!] confirmed by the U.S. Senate[!] to serve as U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey.”). (Plus, good ones from Kate Michelman and Ralph Neas.)

Rather than selecting a nominee for the good of the nation and the court, President Bush has picked a nominee whom he hopes will stop the massive hemorrhaging of support on his right wing. This is a nomination based on weakness, not strength. — Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass.

It is sad that the president felt he had to pick a nominee likely to divide America instead of choosing a nominee in the mold of Sandra Day O’Connor, who would unify us. This controversial nominee, who would make the court less diverse and far more conservative, will get very careful scrutiny from the Senate and from the American people. — Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.

President Bush put the demands of his far-right political base above Americans’ constitutional rights and legal protections by nominating federal appeals court Judge Samuel Alito to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. — Ralph Neas, president of the liberal People For the American Way.

Now the gauntlet has been, I think, thrown down. It was humiliating, it was degrading and it’s a profound and distributing view of Judge Alito that he would uphold spousal notification as he did in the Pennsylvania case, and it raises concerns about his views of women. — Kate Michelman, former president of NARAL-Pro Choice America.

[Presumably that was “disturbing” and not “distributing”; but, who knows? Anything’s possible from NARAL.]
Wow, Kate takes things personally! It was “humiliating” and “degrading” for Pres. Bush to pick Alito. She acts as if Alito raped her and then wouldn’t give her an abortion! Get over yourself.

And then there’s Sen. Leahy:

This is a needlessly provocative nomination. Instead of uniting the country through his choice, the president has chosen to reward one faction of his party at the risk of dividing the country.

All I can say is that if these people are upset, there is much to be happy about with this nomination. It is to be hoped that Alito makes Schumer et al. look as ridiculous as Roberts made them look. One question: why in the world did the President not nominate this man in the first place?


2 thoughts on “(Two of) The Big Three Do Not Disappoint

  1. I think he is doing this just to piss off the Big 3 (to whome I’d add the succubusses Boxer and Pelosi). Frankly, it is sad that Bush could have nominated Che or Stalin himself, but because they would have been Bush’s pick, they’d oppose them, just on the principal.

    Wait, was I implying that they are Commies. You bet your pinko behind I did (not implying you are Timotheos, but anyone *shocked* at what I said). Where’s McCarthy when you need him.

  2. Bush picked Miers, a long-time friend and lackey, to take some steam out of the forsoothed opposition to his true #2 pick, Alito.

    Team Bush knew Alito would catalyze a fight from the Left, so Miers (graciously) volunteered as patsy.

    Just politics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s