Here’s one (along with part 2). Here’s a congregation [I realize that this was four years ago]. I’ve also seen at least a couple on the ALPB discussion boards. Here’s a website for those considering leaving. And here’s WordAlone’s advice. I wonder if anyone’s keeping track…
How Many Will There Be?
19 August 2009 by Timotheos
Posted in Christianity, Denominations, ELCA, Lutheranism | Tagged ELCA, leaving | 4 Comments
4 Responses
Leave a Reply
Pages
-
Who Speaks
. on David Bazan and Loss of F… Timotheos on The Call Process in the L… Rev. Charles I. Bame… on The Call Process in the L… Pilgrim on Curse Your Branches (Just Not … Jo on I Could Be Wrong (But I Don… -
I Spoke
- Just Insert “Lutherans”
- Curse Your Branches (Just Not the One On Which You’re Standing)
- What Does Faithfulness Mean?
- The Press on the CWA
- How Many Will There Be?
- The Death Knell of the ELCA
- Two-thirds or Not Two-thirds?
- Whither Hence for the ELCA?
- “This holy martyr, St. Robert Barnes”
- “‘This is the faith we were taught’”
Archives
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
-
Most Read
-
Most Clicked
-
Who Comes Here
- 73,178 Visitors
Lutherans
- Aardvark Alley
- Angry Lutherans
- Ask the Pastor
- Augsburg 1530
- Babylon Falling
- Bluegrass Lutherans
- Burr in the Burgh
- Cantor’s Padded Balcony
- Concordia Theology
- Concordia: The Lutheran Confessions
- Concordian Sisters of Perpetual Parturition
- Confessing Evangelical
- Cruce Tectum
- Cruising Down the Coast of the High Barbaree
- Cyberbrethren
- CyberStones
- ex tenebris lux
- Four and Twenty+Blackbirds
- From Russia With Love
- GoLCMS
- Gottesblog
- Hoc est Verum
- Horn+Swoggled
- Hot Lutheran on Lutheran Action
- I’m Not That Girl…
- Issues, Etc.
- ITunes U-Concordia Seminary
- Kyrie Eleison
- Little Loci
- Love and Blunder
- Luther at the Movies

- Lutheran Carnival
- lutheran envelopes
- Lutheranism 101
- Minnesota Lutheran
- Necessary Roughness
- Nerd Heaven
- North Prairie Pastor
- Old School Confessional
- Original Evangelical
- Paredwka
- Pirate Christian Radio
- Priestmanship
- Properly Speaking
- Purpose Driven Drinking
- Quicunque vult
- Radical Grace
- Random Dan and Intolerant Elle
- RAsburry’s Res
- Render Unto Caesar…
- St. James the Hoosier
- Suckas take heed
- The Albino Peacock
- The Anxious Bench
- The Terrible Swede
- The Theological Organ
- Tutal
- Uneasy Priest
- Watchful One
- Watersblogged!
Other
- After Abortion
- BlameBush!
- Dawn Eden
- Get Religion
- Glenn Beck
- Haunted by the Holy Ghost
- Little Green Footballs
- Mere Comments
- News Busters
- On the Other Foot
- Real Choice
- Sound Politics
- St. Cynic
- Stuff White People Like
- The “Blog” of “Unnecessary” Quotation Marks
- The Blue Boar
- The Ohio Anglican
- Think Again (Stanley Fish)
- TTLB Ecosystem
- White Around the Collar
Something Else
Uncategorized
Meta




Well, the vote on the sexuality statement is today and that needs a 2/3 vote, which I don’t think it has. Without the sexuality statement, I don’t think the ministry recommendations have a leg to stand on. I could be wrong though.
This article also talks about another option, setting up a de facto synod in the ELCA.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111910440
Isn’t it strange that a study/teaching document requires 2/3, but changing who can be ordained only takes 50% + 1? I’d be willing to bet a lot that even if the study doesn’t pass (it will be close), the recommendations will, on the basis of the simple majority. They almost certainly have that simple majority.
Someone did point out that we require a 2/3 vote to call a pastor, so why wouldn’t we require the same for changes made to the ministry policies. It makes sense to me.