That’s how I see it. My real question is, did Obama forget this Biden comment: “I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that’s a storybook, man.” No latent racism there…
Pages
-
Who Speaks
-
I Spoke
- Just Insert “Lutherans”
- Curse Your Branches (Just Not the One On Which You’re Standing)
- What Does Faithfulness Mean?
- The Press on the CWA
- How Many Will There Be?
- The Death Knell of the ELCA
- Two-thirds or Not Two-thirds?
- Whither Hence for the ELCA?
- “This holy martyr, St. Robert Barnes”
- “‘This is the faith we were taught’”
Archives
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
-
Most Read
-
Most Clicked
-
Who Comes Here
- 72,857 Visitors
Lutherans
- Aardvark Alley
- Angry Lutherans
- Ask the Pastor
- Augsburg 1530
- Babylon Falling
- Bluegrass Lutherans
- Burr in the Burgh
- Cantor’s Padded Balcony
- Concordia Theology
- Concordia: The Lutheran Confessions
- Concordian Sisters of Perpetual Parturition
- Confessing Evangelical
- Cruce Tectum
- Cruising Down the Coast of the High Barbaree
- Cyberbrethren
- CyberStones
- ex tenebris lux
- Four and Twenty+Blackbirds
- From Russia With Love
- GoLCMS
- Gottesblog
- Hoc est Verum
- Horn+Swoggled
- Hot Lutheran on Lutheran Action
- I’m Not That Girl…
- Issues, Etc.
- ITunes U-Concordia Seminary
- Kyrie Eleison
- Little Loci
- Love and Blunder
- Luther at the Movies

- Lutheran Carnival
- lutheran envelopes
- Lutheranism 101
- Minnesota Lutheran
- Necessary Roughness
- Nerd Heaven
- North Prairie Pastor
- Old School Confessional
- Original Evangelical
- Paredwka
- Pirate Christian Radio
- Priestmanship
- Properly Speaking
- Purpose Driven Drinking
- Quicunque vult
- Radical Grace
- Random Dan and Intolerant Elle
- RAsburry’s Res
- Render Unto Caesar…
- St. James the Hoosier
- Suckas take heed
- The Albino Peacock
- The Anxious Bench
- The Terrible Swede
- The Theological Organ
- Tutal
- Uneasy Priest
- Watchful One
- Watersblogged!
Other
- After Abortion
- BlameBush!
- Dawn Eden
- Get Religion
- Glenn Beck
- Haunted by the Holy Ghost
- Little Green Footballs
- Mere Comments
- News Busters
- On the Other Foot
- Real Choice
- Sound Politics
- St. Cynic
- Stuff White People Like
- The “Blog” of “Unnecessary” Quotation Marks
- The Blue Boar
- The Ohio Anglican
- Think Again (Stanley Fish)
- TTLB Ecosystem
- White Around the Collar
Something Else
Uncategorized
Meta




I’m also surprised at the choice. But, my question is, will McCain make any better choice?
Yeah, it’s up in the air.
Tim
I think that no matter who wins, the Congressional elections in 2010 will go to the opposite party (with a substantial majority)… so I guess when considering the outcome of 2008, one has to think about long-term versus short-term goals and victories… I think a Republican loss in the 2008 Presidential election is better for the Party in the long run, assuming that they can garner a majority of Congressional seats in 2010 (and I think the reverse is true for the Democratic Party as well).
As for being better for the country, I also think a Republican loss in 2008 is more desirable… McCain does not represent conservative Republicanism, his win will solidify the big-government movement within the Republican Party, and all future Presidents will either be big-government Democrats or big-government Republicans… conservatism will no longer be an option.
Karl
It may be that it would be better in the long run for McCain to lose–but I can’t help thinking about the SCOTUS justices who will be nominated in the next few years, and it will most certainly not be better if Obama nominates them.
If, however, the Congressional elections might go to the opposite party, as you predict, it is not so far out of the realm of possibility that if a big-government Republican is elected president, the next president may successfully run against that style of governing.
Tim
I am not convinced a McCain presidency kills conservatism. Bush has not been a conservative president and the conservative movement is not dead in the Republican party yet. Arguably, McCain is more conservative than Bush on some issues (Government waste).
I do think the nation suffers significantly if Obama is elected. Many people are saying Obama will be nothing but a Jimmy Carter who will usher in a Reagan era. The problem is that we are still suffering from Jimmy Carter’s presidency. Carter established the Department of Energy which has spent lots of taxpayer money with few tangible results for those taxpayers. Carter administration policies played an important role in Mugabe coming to power in Zimbabwe and the Iranian revolution only occurred after Carter withdrew support for the Shah. Obama could do a lot of damage in four years.
What is needed is someone who can properly articulate the conservative message like Reagan did. That is all we need to bring conservatives into power because I think America is fundamentally a conservative nation. Even the Democrats come out in favor American ideals and don’t mention raising taxes in their speeches.
If Obama had nominated Hillary for VP, I think McCain would have lost. Biden was definitely a poor choice.
Well, folks, what do you think about the Sarah Palin surprise??
Should be interesting! A female, pro-life vice-president! So funny that the Democrats are hitting her for “lack of experience,” because she’d be a heartbeat away from the presidency! Yeah, but having someone without experience as the President, that’s a different story. Stupid.
Tim
Actually, as governor of a major energy-producing state, Palin, is the only one on either ticket with executive office experience, including dealing with other countries, e.g., a recent pipeline deal with Canada.
Palin is intelligent and has demonstrated leadership capabilities. She can think on her feet, and doesn’t turn into a stuttering buffoon when no teleprompter is around.
The VP debate will be fun to watch; Palin will gut Biden like a fish.